logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.11.03 2015고단3244
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:00 on April 29, 2015, the Defendant driven a CMF5 vehicle with a volume of about 5km from the front day of the horse in the New Cancer-dong, Daegu-gu, to the front day of the same Gu, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.135% of the blood alcohol concentration.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (SM5)(SM5) provides that the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a car.

On April 29, 2015, at around 01:00, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol as set forth in Paragraph 1, and led to a two-lane of the two-lane between the two-lanes in front of the central police box located in 382 as at the center of Daegu Jung-gu as at the center of Daegu-gu.

At the time, the vehicle was stopped at night and at the front of the driving direction of the Defendant’s vehicle, so in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to safely operate the steering system by accurately operating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, failed to avoid DK5 si owned by the victim New Transport Service Co., Ltd., which was under a stop due to negligence while driving in the same place, and went away from the left part of the Defendant’s vehicle with the left part of DK5 si, which was the left part of the said si. On the front of the E cafeteria located in Daegu Jung-gu, the Defendant got off the G SN125 Kaba, which was parked in front of the Defendant’s vehicle, and went back to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle’s right-hand part of the victim’s H, which was parked in the same place. The Defendant got out as the front part of the victim’s vehicle’s right-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in performing the above duties that led to KRW 255,000 of the above K5 taxi repair cost, and that the above 1,515,000 of the repair cost, respectively, the Defendant’s repair cost is KRW 525,800 of the above Poter truck.

arrow