logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.02.06 2017가단24672
제3자이의
Text

1. The Defendant has an executory power over Nonparty B’s acquisition of the instant claim against the Seoul Western District Court No. 2017Hu43506.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, indicating the claim, filed an application for compulsory execution against Nonparty B based on the executory payment order in the Seoul Western District Court Decision 2017Hu43506, the Seoul Western District Court, and applied for compulsory execution against the items listed in the attached attachment list. However, the “project LG) DW700 in the above table No. 6” is not owned by Nonparty B, but owned by the Plaintiff.

Therefore, according to the executory payment order copy of the Seoul Western District Court Decision 2017 tea43506 case against Nonparty B, compulsory execution against Nonparty B against “project (LG) DW700 column 6 in the attached attachment list should be denied.”

2. Judgment with no applicable provisions of Acts (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow