logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2016.02.12 2015고단451
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2015, while under the influence of alcohol at around 23:36, the Defendant driven CK7 car and proceeded in the direction of the central line in the direction of the air transport mission from the direction of the air transport mission, while driving the front road D at the time of air, the Defendant was under the demand of stopping and getting off the vehicle from the G in the circumstances where the F Zone of the Gongju Police Station, which was under the influence of alcohol, was under the influence of alcohol.

Defendant 1 got a demand from G to put in a breath in a breath of the patrol car that was set up near the breath, and then avoided the measurement by putting in another place the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath.

On one occasion of the left side of G, followed by walking knee in the right side of G, and continuing to knee on the uniforms of G police officers, and committing injury to the victim G (52) with no open room for treatment for about three weeks, such as cerebral lele in which there is no open room for treatment.

After that, the Defendant was arrested as an offender in the act of obstructing the performance of official duties on August 31, 2015, and was transferred to the F District located in H in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do. On August 31, 2015, the Defendant was demanded from 23:52 to 1.00:24 September 2015 to 1.00 to 24, 2015 to comply with a drinking-free measurement by injecting a drinking-free measuring instrument for four times from 1,00 police officers belonging to F District to 23:52 on August 31, 2015, but the Defendant refused to comply with the drinking-free measurement by avoiding

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the traffic control of police officers and the prevention of traffic hazards, and at the same time inflicted injury on the victim G, and did not comply with the police officer's drinking measurement without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement G is a public official's written diagnosis of the police's statement report, the situation report of the driver's driver, the notification of the result of the crackdown on drinking driving, and the application of the law to the field photographing photographs.

arrow