The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant merely rejected the payment of the taxi fee claimed in excess, and there is a justifiable reason for the refusal of payment.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misunderstanding of facts or by misunderstanding of legal principles.

2. Determination

A. As to the facts charged in the instant case, the lower court: (a) even if the same section is ordinarily the same, there is a vehicle that can charge 9,800 won due to the location of passengers, the signal lights, and the flow of traffic; (b) the taxi engineer C was unable to be deemed to be an unfair fare; and (c) the taxi engineer C was unable to get off the Defendant at the time; and (d) the Defendant was getting out of the subway.

c) fraud.

Money shall not be paid.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the police station consistently stated that the Defendant was going to the F District by going to the F District; and (b) the police officer E also testified that the Defendant was guilty on the ground that the Defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact that he did not pay a taxi fee without justifiable grounds, on the grounds that the Defendant could sufficiently recognize the fact that he did not pay a taxi fee without justifiable grounds.

B. Examining the above judgment of the court below in comparison with the records, the judgment of the court below is just and it is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as alleged by the defendant.

shall not be deemed to exist.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.