logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.04.01 2016고정685
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On May 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the business of the Victim C on the ground that the damaged Party C’s “E cafeteria” operated by the Victim C in Busan Ya-gu on May 14, 2015, does not sell the alcohol to the Defendant; (b) “I am this year;

the Republic of Korea has been two times or more; and

“In doing so, they interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force over about 30 minutes by putting the crypt while taking the bath, preventing customers from entering the crypted.”

B. On July 19, 2015, around 19:00, Defendant F, who interfered with the business affairs of the victim F, drinked on “H restaurant” operated by the victim F of the victim F in Busan Ygu, and deemed the victim to have only a fluor and fluort with the owner, but on the ground that the victim refused to do so, the bit of bitbitch bitch bitch bitch bit

20 20 20 20 202

The victim’s restaurant business was interfered with by force over about 10 minutes, such as scaming the scam to scam, drinking customers who are frighting with the trial expenses, leaving the scam to the other customers.

2. On June 1, 2015, at around 14:00, the Defendant: (a) taken aboard the J-si in Busan Yandong-dong, Busan Yandong-dong, with the same attitude as the victim I would normally pay for the taxi expenses; (b) but did not pay KRW 3,000 for the taxi expenses; and (c) obtained it by deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of each statement, the 112 Report Processing Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of fraud), and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow