Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

Defendant .

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of business operating the Sicheon-si D Gameland, and Defendant B is the money exchanger in charge of money exchange in the above game area, and Defendant C is the employee of Defendant C. Defendant A has used the above game from February 29, 2012 to March 10, 2012. Defendant A had 40 players use the above game in the above game area, from March 10, 2012, and had them use the game in the background screen different from the contents as classified by the Game Rating Board in the game Rating Board. Defendant B, from March 29, 2012, deducted from the contents as classified by the Game Rating Board, 3, 6, 6, and 50 gift certificates if the save appear, if the save appear, 50 gift certificates if the save appear, 50,000 gift certificates if the saved the acquired gift certificates into the machine, deducted or altered points to KRW 500 per 10,500,000 for customers.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide game products with contents different from the contents of the rating classification and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products, and had them engage in gambling and other speculative acts using game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Each statement of G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P and Q;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Game description;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act (the point of providing game products, the contents of which are different from the classification of game products), Article 44 (1) 1, and Article 28 subparagraph 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act (the point of having provided game products perform speculative acts using game products), and Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act (the point of business of exchanging game products with the result of a game).

1. Defendant A, C, who has chosen the penalty; and