Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 5, 2015, at around 23:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim by breathing the victim E (40 years of age) under the influence of alcohol in front of the D main points located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and breathing his breath and breath bath by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. the legal statement of the witness F;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statement protocol (1 time) to E;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the crime, the selection of fines (including the minor degree of assault and the fact that the victim also has considerable responsibility for the occurrence of this case)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. On June 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the victim E(40) under the influence of alcohol in front of the moving point in Seoul, Nam-gu, Incheon; (b) the victim’s face to take about seven weeks due to drinking; and (c) the victim suffered injury, i.e., he/she was the victim, who was under the influence of alcohol in front of the moving point in D (40) and the victim’s face to take about seven weeks of treatment.

2. In a judgment of conviction in a criminal trial, the conviction should be based on evidence of probative value, which makes it possible for a judge to have the truth that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt, and if there is no such proof, the conviction cannot be made even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant.

The evidence corresponding to this part of the facts charged is the victim E's investigative agency and this court's statement.

E testified in this court that “the Defendant was used on the floor unilaterally by putting ebbbbbbbling,” but the witness F at the site was not so significant, but went back by ebbbbing in the site.

Since then, the victim out together with the defendant was exceeded to the roadside floor, and the fee was paid.