logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2014.11.27 2014고단165
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 01:20 on May 18, 2014, Defendant A reported that he was assaulted by others in front of an entertainment tavern “F”, located in Heungnam-gun E, but did not mislead himself, Defendant A, despite having been notified that he could have been arrested as a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, committed assault to the security guards of the G police box, “this sponse sponse” and “A sponse sponse sponse sponse” and “A sponse sponse sponse sponse sponse spons sponse sponse sponse sponse sponse s

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of official duties concerning the dispatch of police officers to the field.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 제1항 기재 일시, 장소에서, 자신의 동생인 위 A이 폭행을 당하였다고 신고를 하였으나 경찰관들이 가해자를 데리고 오지 않는다는 이유로 "이 호로새끼야"라고 욕설을 하며 G파출소 소속 경위 I의 턱을 이마로 때리고, 오른쪽 엄지손가락으로 배부위를 쿡쿡 찌르며 발로 정강이를 때리는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of official duties concerning the dispatch of police officers to the field.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to L, H, M, I, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Attachment to photographs of damaged parts of victim I);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Determination of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow