beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around August 2007, the Defendant lent a proposal of 80,000 won to the same victim for the purpose of apartment deposit, while having known the victim C in the Cheongdo of China around August 2007, and received full repayment of the loan around December 2007, but did not hold the loan certificate, thereby deceiving the Chinese court and deceiving the money.
1. On June 2, 2008, for the purpose of uttering, the victim’s name is forged by affixing a seal affixed to the victim’s name on the next page of the victim’s name, and at the same time, the victim’s name is forged by submitting it to the officials in charge of the same-sex City of the Republic of Korea, which is located in the Civil Code of the Republic of Korea at the same time, where he/she is aware of such fact to the officials in charge of the same-sex City of the Republic of Korea.
2. On June 2, 2008, the facts are as follows: (a) in the administrative district of Chungcheong City as described in the preceding paragraph, the Civil Court brought a lawsuit against both victims, even though there is no credit against the Defendant, that “the borrowed money amounting to 429,041 (Korean Won 49,863,000), 78,534 (30% interest per annum), and the borrowed money amounting to 80,000 won” on the basis of false credit, and deceiving the above Chinese Civil Court by submitting a forged loan certificate, etc., and thereby deceiving the above Chinese Civil Court, and by having the above court rendered a favorable judgment on July 28, 2009, it acquired the above Chinese Civil Code amounting to 609,747 (Korean Won 109,754,460 won).
Summary of Evidence
1. Each of the statements made by C and F at the investigative agency of C and F’s each legal statement was partially reversed, but there may be errors in the course of memory after about 4 to 6 years passed, if C prepared a loan certificate as set forth in paragraph 1 of the judgment, it would have not mistakenly entered his name or address, and all of the other documents written by C around that time.