logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원상주지원 2020.05.26 2019가단7869
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. According to the facts of recognition A7 and the purport of the oral argument, the Plaintiff received a seizure and collection order (this court 2019TT 364) on the Defendant’s wage claim (e.g., pay, bonus, and other wage claim of similar nature) against the Defendant as KRW 40 million, and then served on the Defendant on April 17, 2019.

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion is that C concludes an employment contract with the Defendant and seeks collection as its wage claim amounting to KRW 40 million.

According to the whole purport of the oral argument, C signed an entrustment contract with the Defendant on October 30, 2018, and settled the fee, and it is only recognized that the contract was terminated on August 16, 2019, and entered into an employment contract otherwise.

there is no evidence to prove that there is a benefit claim.

The plaintiff's claim based on the employment contract between C and the defendant is rejected.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed for reasons.

arrow