logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2011. 5. 13. 선고 2010누6854 판결
관세경정처분취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

제1심 판결을 취소한다. 피고가 2009. 3. 30. 원고 주식회사 ○○네트웍스에 대하여 한 관세1,147,443,720원의 경정처분 및 같은 날 원고 주식회사 ○○엑스윌에 대하여 한 관세406,746,390원의 경정처분을 각 취소한다.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

This court's reasoning is as follows, following the 4th 13th 13th m of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments to the 8th malth 15th malth malth malth malth malth malth malth malth malth malth malth alth m

2. Additional parts; and

A. The assertion

"In addition, when the plaintiffs import the goods of this case, the defendant examined both the invoice and the import declaration certificate, and the staff in charge determined it as Aluminium ingot and made customs procedures by applying 1% of the tariff rate. Therefore, the plaintiffs' trust in the defendant's opinion statement should be protected.B. And when the plaintiffs import the goods of this case, it is not sufficient to recognize that the defendant's employee had conducted customs procedures by applying 1% of the tariff rate as alinium alinium alinium, and there is no other evidence to recognize this differently, even if the plaintiffs' assertion is alleged above, in light of the above legal principles, the plaintiffs' claim cannot be viewed as a public opinion statement that is subject to trust protection in light of the above legal principles.

arrow