logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.09.21 2018누45741
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including costs incurred by participation in the appeal.

Reasons

1. The contents asserted by the Plaintiff in this court are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance court, and the judgment of the first instance court rejecting the Plaintiff’s assertion even if the Plaintiff’s assertion was re-examineed based on the evidence presented by the parties in the first instance

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court on this case is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases: (a) the “general secretary” in the left partitions as the “general secretary department”; (b) the 6th and 16th of the 6th of the 8th of the 8th of the 8th of the 2015 as the “Plaintiff”; and (c) the “on May 2015” as the “on May 2016”; and (d) the 12th of the 12th of the 21st of the 12th of the 201st of the 12th of the 12th of the 12th of the 2012 as the “on

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow