Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle B.
On October 29, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at around 13:30 on October 29, 2014, and got the U.S. to proceed to the U.S. four-lane road from the uppermost distance of the gold farm to the O.S. 1-lane, according to the Daejeon U.S. U.S. U.S. P.
Since there is a cross-section where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to view the front side and the right and the right of the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle and to prevent accidents in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the signals.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the DNA car driven by the victim C (the age of 33) who was directly driven under the new code due to the negligence of the Defendant in violation of the signal, from the right side of the car driven by the Defendant.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered damages such as cage cage cage cage cages, etc. which require approximately four weeks of medical treatment from the above occupational negligence, and suffered damages such as cage cage cage cage cage cage cages, etc. which require approximately eight weeks of medical treatment from the victim E (57 years of age) who was accompanied by
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. C’s statement;
1. A traffic accident report;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that vehicles run by the defendant are covered by comprehensive insurance and the fact that there is no specific penalty power other than once a fine, etc.) or more;