Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around December 27, 2017, around 01:55, at around 01:01, the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu Incheon apartment 101 Dong 6, had a main illness, which is a dangerous object, to the window of stairs, and stated in the instant indictment that “B apartment 101, a major illness, which is a dangerous object in front of the 101 Dong, was faced with the 6th apartment floor above the above apartment.” However, according to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the facts identical to the above criminal facts, can be acknowledged according to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, and even if the correction was made, it does not affect the Defendant’s exercise of right

As the repair cost is clearly stated in the indictment, it shall be corrected ex officio, as it is obvious that the "unacceptance of repair" stated in the indictment is a clerical error, such as breaking the 6th floor glass window managed by the above apartment management unit, damaging the repair cost of KRW 80,00,000,00,000, and shouldering the glass window of the shoulder and the small-scale bottle, which was parked at the lower place, of the victim C, who was parked at the lower place.

It was damaged to do so.

The defendant, carrying dangerous objects, thereby damaging property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Photographs (on-site and damaged photographs);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes notifying departments related to 112 Incident reporting;

1. Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order does not have the record of being punished for the same crime, and the crime of this case is against the crime of this case. The crime of this case was committed on the 6th apartment floor by the defendant, who was an object dangerous to the windows of stairs on the 6th apartment floor, and broken down the glass of stairs and the glass of the next parking spaces, and its circumstance and method, etc., it is highly dangerous, and the damage is recovered from the injured party or the damage is recovered properly.