1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception of adding or adding the corresponding parts of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows, and adding the judgment as referred to in paragraph 2, and therefore, it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance. As such, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation

No. 5. 15. The plaintiff's opinion was cited as "the plaintiff," and the 18.m.'s opinion was cited as "the opinion of the plaintiff, which was low and evaluated".

The 8th parallel 10th parallel 9th parallel 14th parallel 8th parallel 10th parallel 9th parallel 14th parallel 199.

After the 9th 14th 14th 1st m3th m3th m3th m4th m3th m4th m4th m4th m3th m4th m3th m4th m4th m3th m4th m4th m3th m4th m4th m3th m4th m3th m4th m3th m4th m4th m3th m4th m4th m4th m4th m3th m4th m4th m4th m4th m4th m4th m3th m4th m4th m4th m4th m4th m4th m4th m4th m4th m4th m4th m4th m4th

In light of the fact that the first instance court appraiser did not consider such circumstances at all in evaluating individual factors among the value formation factors, the difference between the rate of the area of a site site per square meter in comparison with the loan of this case was not reflected in individual factors among the value formation factors, and the result of the first instance court appraisal cannot be deemed unlawful.