logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.20 2016고단7101
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of C in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 03:41 on November 13, 2016, the Defendant: (b) reported that the Defendant, who opened the table table, sprinks, sprinks to drink and drink the Defendant; and (c) assaulted the Victim’s clothes with his hand when 10 times the part, spacks, and sprinks of the Victim.

2. On November 13, 2016, at around 04:53, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties; (b) obstructed the Defendant’s use of a police box consisting of a police box affiliated with the above F police box to seek a document to arrest a flagrant offender in his/her hand; and (c) obstructed the Defendant’s use of a bridge, such as cutting off the bridge part of G on two occasions; (d) spit the left part of G in his/her hand; and (e) spit the boom on his/her face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D or G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victim D's partially damaged photo, or a dynamic image that obstructs the performance of official duties taken on CCTV, and to photograph such images;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The grounds for sentencing, the degree of interference with the execution of official duties, and the duration of each crime, etc. under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the same Act, shall be considered;

arrow