(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.12.20 2017가단103634

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.12.20 2017가단103634

손해배상(산)

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 26,159,515 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from September 13, 2013 to December 20, 2019; and (b) the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of and limitation on liability for damages;

A. The Defendant is a company established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling electrical and electronic materials. Around March 2013, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant company and was engaged in the manufacturing of clean studs. 2) On September 13, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) around 04:10, while working for the crating team at the 3rd floor of the Defendant company’s building, as long as the crating team of the crating team, which is a pen’s raw material, caused noise to one of the metal roll of the studs; (b) the noise was generated; (c) the crating team, while working for the crating team at the 3rd floor of the Defendant company’s building, caused damage to the right part of the studs; and (d) the incomplete part of the studs found the studs of the studs to the right side of the studs; (d) the Plaintiff suffered damage to the 3rd joints of the 2nd column, the 4nd column.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Defendant did not provide the Plaintiff with safety education regarding the use of the valleys, and did not appoint a superior in charge of safety management at the time of the instant accident and did not manage and supervise the valleys work. [The grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 2, and 4 (including household numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)

- The purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, it is reasonable to deem that the defendant violated the duty to provide safety education so that the plaintiff who is a worker does not cause safety accidents in the course of providing labor, as well as the duty to take measures to manage and supervise the work process by placing the safety manager at the workplace, and that the accident of this case occurred thereby. Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to

C. On the other hand, the above evidence and the whole pleadings are restricted.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.05.08 2017가단204987

-수원지방법원안산지원 2016.07.20 2014가단38487

-의정부지방법원 2019.02.19 2017가단119103

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.22 2017가단5239505

-청주지방법원영동지원 2020.09.09 2019가합810