logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.10.06 2015고정506
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 23, 2014, at around 20:55, the Defendant: (a) 20:55, when the Defendant and the Victim D (the 59-year-old age) were living together with the Defendant and the Victim D (the 59-year-old age) were drinking together with the victim; (b) took a dispute after drinking with the victim; (c) went over the bottom of the victim’s chest with both descendants once pushed back to the floor; and (d) taken three parts of the victim’s left hand, taken three times in volume and walk back twice in volume; and (e) took two-three times in order to avoid this end, the Defendant sustained at least two-three-three weeks of treatment (e.g., hospitalization for five days and treatment for the 64 days) for the left side of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (the purport that there is an entry of the enemy in excess of the victim) ;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. The term “personal immigration status” attached to the investigation report (Attachment to the current status of entry and departure of each individual) includes 1. Medical certificate, 1. Medical certificate, 6.0 won confirmation, medical expenses statement, and receipt

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes “four copies of photograph” (Evidence No. 14)

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the Detention in the Sleep Station [the defense counsel asserts that the victim’s injury was caused by the Defendant’s act, regardless of whether the victim was injured or not, only when the victim was fested and was under the eyebrow, and the victim did not have any other harmful act, and the victim was not exposed to it, and that the act of damaging the victim’s injury constitutes self-defense. In addition, the victim’s injury can be deemed to have been caused by the Defendant’s act, so the victim’s injury can be deemed to have been caused by the Defendant’s act (the Defendant requested a formal trial and sought the Defendant’s wife that the amount of fine is too large while claiming a formal trial).

arrow