logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.01.21 2015구합9001
총포소지허가취소처분결정
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On the basis of Article 12(1) of the former Control of Firearms, Swords, Explosives, etc. Act (amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013), the Plaintiff obtained permission to possess two recommended guns as follows.

On October 28, 2009, the Defendant, on March 11, 2011, notified the Plaintiff on June 23, 2015, on the ground of Article 47(1) of the Act on the Safety Control of Firearms, Swords, Explosives, Etc. (hereinafter “Total Control Act”), that the Defendant would revoke all permission to possess the said two recommended guns on the ground that the Defendant, on June 23, 2015, revoked the permission to possess the said two guns on the ground of Article 47(1) of the said Act.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). 【No dispute exists, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the main sentence of Article 47(1) and Article 47(1)1 of the Act on the Control of Total Inspection and Inspection of Firearms as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition, the government agency that has obtained permission to possess guns may revoke permission to possess guns if deemed necessary to prevent disasters or to maintain public safety

The following facts can be acknowledged to the Plaintiff in full view of the respective statements and the purport of the entire pleadings in the evidence Nos. 4 through 9.

① From 195 to 1998, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a fine due to three times of violence.

② On October 27, 2005, the Plaintiff, while drinking friendship F and alcohol in a new wall restaurant, was fluencing the Plaintiff’s head due to the Plaintiff’s illness, and F was flucing the Plaintiff’s head due to the Plaintiff’s illness, and was flucing the Defendant’s head before the restaurant.

The Plaintiff received a fine of KRW 500,000 as a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a joint injury at night).

③ On January 2, 2009, the Plaintiff considered his/her employee G to retire from work late at his/her office on the ground that he/she would retire from his/her office at the late time. The Plaintiff expressed his/her face and back head 10 times on the floor of his/her hand and drinking, and made his/her back her face and back head 10 times on the back.

arrow