logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.12.19 2014고단724
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for 3 years from the date of the conclusion of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the purpose of fraud in the Changwon District Court’s territorial branch for a period of eight months, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 22, 2014.

1. Around June 7, 2012, the Defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim C that “I will use the land which was sold by auction of real estate at the court, which was sold by the court, as the fund for purchasing real estate at the court, if I borrowed the amount of KRW 40,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

However, at the time, the Defendant was liable to pay approximately KRW 852,80,000,00 to the Defendant, and all real estate owned by the Defendant had no real property value due to the establishment of a collateral security right or a provisional attachment, and even if they borrowed money from the victim, they did not have the intent or ability to repay the money within the agreed period.

As above, the Defendant, from July 19, 201 to July 19, 2012, by deceiving the victim as above and receiving KRW 40 million from the victim as the borrowed money on the same day from the time when he/she came to receive KRW 40 million from the victim, he/she received KRW 43 million in total on eight occasions as shown in the annexed List of Crimes.

2. On September 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim E made a false statement to the victim E by posting a phone, stating, “The Defendant shall pay KRW 5 million to C who operates a platform from a big system,” instead of that, up to September 2012, he/she would complete payment as the money that he/she works in a bank until the end of September 2012, by inserting five million won.”

However, due to the reasons stated in the above paragraph (1), even if the victim paid the amount of five million won on behalf of the defendant, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the amount within the agreed time limit.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and has him belong to it.

arrow