logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.05.11 2018고정155
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is in charge of production management as a management director from Company B located in Busan City.

The labels, etc. of foods or additives for sale shall not be sold, imported, displayed, transported or used for business for the purpose of sale unless they are marked in compliance with the standards.

Nevertheless, from August 28, 2017 to November 14, 2017, the Defendant purchased without the indication at the above place (name of products: G) 2,500km at H in the Dongdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si H, and used it for the production and sale of exhaust kimchi, heat-free kimchi, massage kimchi, etc.

2. Defendant B is a juristic person established for the purpose of distributing and selling kimchi and food-related products.

The defendant, at the same date and time as the statement in paragraph 1, used the defendant's work for the production and sale of distribution kimchi, heatless kimchi, spawn kimchi, etc. by using the products without indication as described in paragraph 1, where the above A, who is an employee of the defendant, does not place any indication as to the defendant's work.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. A report on detection, on-site photographs, and a statement of transactions (G);

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel asserted to the effect that the act of violating the Food Sanitation Act was not committed even if the salted amount was not indicated on the salted amount, because the business registration certificate, the business registration certificate, the entire certificate of registered matters, and each food item manufacturing report [the Defendants and the defense counsel claimed that the salted amount in this case

However, in full view of Defendant A’s legal statement, the evidence itself, and the judgment, it is recognized that the Defendants used salted fish in the course of producing kimchi without marking that meets the standard.

In addition, materials to create a set of fish fish

Even if the salted fish of this case is deemed to fall under the category of foods with the criteria for marking under Article 10 (1) of the Food Sanitation Act, and according to Article 2 subparagraph 9 of the same Act, “the business” is deemed to fall under the category of “the business.”

arrow