logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.07 2015고단1117
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000 (O million).

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has worked in the "E" restaurant in the Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju.

At around 16:00 on September 17, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness for a violation of the Food Sanitation Act against Gwangju District Court No. 104, the law of 104, the law of 2014 high-level900, and took an oath.

In the above court, the Defendant testified to the effect that “A police officer, on April 19, 2014, sent a week one hour prior to the control over C’s E-Operation, and during that period, C prevented customers from going to the stage and singing to two times, and C prevented customers from getting singing even after the police officer was dispatched.”

However, on April 19, 2014, the Defendant arrived at the above 10 minutes prior to the arrival of the police officer, and did not have complied with the two North Koreas for about one hour at the above 10 minutes. Accordingly, there was no witness among them to stop the customer from going up to two times, and there was no fact that the police officer sent the above 10 minutes to the above 10 minutes, and there was no fact that C prevented the customer from going up at the stage.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Public prosecutor's suspect interrogation protocol of the accused and C (a copy in case of C);

1. A copy of the protocol of examination of witness (Seoul District Court 2014 High Court 900);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, letter of apologys or on-site photographs (Evidence No. 18,20)

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above;

arrow