beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is the honoror of Naju-si, and B is the contractor who operates a sub-speak factory in the name of "D" in the Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-si.
The project is an energy saving support project implemented to reduce the cost of management of farmers due to increase in international oil prices and agricultural materials prices and to promote energy use efficiency, the subsidy related to the project was paid to the person subject to the project 40% of the total project cost in the year 2011 and 50% of the total project cost after the year 2012 on the condition that the person subject to the project should pay it as self-charge.
The Defendant: (a) was a person who sets a farmer in a vinyl located in Biju City E and F; and (b) obtained subsidies by submitting evidentiary documents, such as the details of the project and the certificate of self-payment, etc., after completing construction from a farm to his own charge; (c) using the fact that the construction project installed in Biju City for the efficient use of energy in Biju City, which was implemented by Biju City, was provided with subsidies; and (d) had D, a contractor implement the construction project without paying his own charges, and submitted the documents by manipulating the documents as if the Defendant paid his own charges when commencing the construction project.
Around August 22, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with the above B, prepared and submitted a request for the payment of subsidy of KRW 10,250,000 to the public official in charge of energy utilization efficiency in G at the HH office of Naju City, G, the Defendant: “The Defendant, in collusion with the above B, shall pay KRW 20,50,000 of the total project cost to the public official in charge of energy use efficiency in the energy use efficiency in the operation of A in Jeonnam-si, E and F, and shall pay KRW 10,50,000 of the project cost.”
However, the facts are as follows: (a) the Defendant paid to B only an amount equivalent to KRW 2,270,000 out of KRW 10,250,000, and the remainder amount is KRW 7,980,000.