logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2011.01.31 2010고합483 (1)
정치자금법위반 등
Text

Defendant

KE and KG shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000,000, and Defendant KF shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,00.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No teacher of a national or public school who is a State public official shall support any specific political party or political organization, whatever the pretext it is, with money or material for political purposes.

In addition, anyone is prohibited from contributing any political fund in a way that is not provided for in the Political Funds Act, and anyone who intends to contribute any support fund to any political party before March 13, 2006 shall contribute any support fund to the supporters' association of the political party and shall not directly contribute any support fund to any political party. From March 13, 2006 when the supporters' association was abolished, anyone is prohibited from contributing any support fund to any political party including the form of leading the supporters' association of the political party.

1. [2010 Gohap59] Defendant KE (Defendant 46.) (Defendant 46.) below the Defendant’s name, stating only the number of the Defendant on the trial records, such as the entry, together with the description, as well as the number of the Defendant.

On March 1, 1994, the defendant was appointed as a teacher of a national or public school who is a state public official and is currently in office as a teacher of the KH high school.

The Defendant charged the Defendant with the automatic payment of KRW 10,000 from the Defendant’s Daegu Bank account via the cm transfer method (hereinafter “Financial Settlement Board”) around February 2, 2006 or around February 27, 2006, the Defendant charged the Defendant with the Defendant’s intent to subscribe to the Defendant as a party member fee (see, e.g., the part of the judgment of the instant case rendered on January 26, 201), and it is difficult to readily conclude that the Defendants intended to have intended to pay the “party membership fee” as a party member fee under the Political Fund Act even with the amount paid by the Defendants as a party member fee under the Political Fund Act (see, e.g., the part of the judgment of the instant case rendered by the court).

arrow