beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of 350,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A On January 16, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment was finalized on January 24, 2013. On May 30, 2013, Defendant B was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, etc. and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 8, 2013.
D and E solicited the opening of a mobile phone on the pretext of giving a loan to many unspecified persons in return for the purchase of a mobile phone, and opened the mobile phone through the opening of the mobile phone through the opening of the mobile phone to a "TM" organization. While the Defendants, F, and G have opened a mobile phone through D and E from August 201 to the opening of the mobile phone, they wanted to suspend the transaction with the above accomplices with the knowledge that the mobile phone opened through D and E is not a normal opening, not a normal opening.
However, the above D and E proposed to the Defendants and F that “if the monetary power is directly managed at H, it would not be subject to the redemption of rebates from the radio operator, and there is no reason to deem losses.” At the same time, the Defendants and F would change the opening of the mobile phone through D and E. In the event they open the mobile phone through D and E, the Defendants and F carried out the opened mobile phone from China to China, etc., and the customers were informed by the organization as they did not have the obligation to pay the mobile phone charges, so the mobile phone charges to be imposed on the opening users would not be paid normally thereafter, and even if they were aware that the mobile phone charges are not paid normally after the organization, they received the rebates fees, etc. from the radio operator, and gave consent to the crime of D and E for the purpose of getting off the phone.
Therefore, the Defendants and F, around January 9, 2012, using a copy of the I's identification card, which was transferred from D and E in the above H, is a mobile phone to be opened.