(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.09.07 2018고단2220

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.09.07 2018고단2220

재물손괴

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor on February 21, 2018 by the Seoul Northern District Court for property damage, etc.

5. 14. The execution of the sentence was completed.

The defendant has weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to stimulative disorder, etc.

[2018 Highest 2220]

1. On May 27, 2018, around 17:40 on May 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around the victim’s house located in the apartment of Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (b) opened the entrance door; (c) opened the entrance door without opening the entrance door; (d) opened a fireproof part of the market value equivalent to KRW 20,000,000 on the victim’s ownership; (c) opened the entrance door in the entrance door owned by the victim; (d) destroyed the wheel 1,00,000 on the floor; (e) opened the wheel 1,8:10 on the same day; and (e) opened the front door to the victim’s house in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu; (e) opened the entrance door; and (e) opened the door door, 3,000,000 won in the market value of the victim’s building; and (e) opened the above 18:10,000 square meters.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

[2018 Highest 2706]

2. On May 29, 2018, around 21:47, the Defendant: (a) took a disturbance to the police station room in Dobong-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, 403, Dobong-gu, Seoul, and (b) was demanded to refrain from the investigation of the police station and the action E affiliated with D.

Nevertheless, the defendant continued to play sound, and the above E was timeed to enter the above E as a son's drinking in order to restrain it.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted the above E, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the management of the detention room in the police station, and at the same time, the victim E (the victim E) was engaged in a brupt and a brupting and a brupting event with which the treatment period cannot be known.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 2220]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.10.27 2015고단1418

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.10.18 2018고단885

-서울남부지방법원 2019.08.07 2019고단300

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2016.12.16 2016고단317

-대전지방법원 2016.02.05 2015고단1850