Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around September 29, 2015, around 22:15, the victim F (n, 45 years of age) who walked a road was her desire to do so on the front of the “E” wing-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si. In so doing, the victim and the victim were her desireed to do so by drinking so, and the victim committed assaulting the victim by breaking the breath’s breath in his hand against the breath of the Defendant’s breath.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Application of each legal statement statute in the witness F and B;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260 of the same Act, and Article 260 of the Criminal Act, which provides for relevant

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances in favor of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: The degree of assault is insignificant, contingency crimes in the state of main operation, and the occurrence of a crime by the victim is not less than a previous conviction, and there is no more criminal record of suspension of execution or more serious responsibility for the occurrence of the crime. Unfavorable circumstances: Although a previous and several times of violence, the crime in this case was committed again, and the crime in this case was committed again, no active effort is made to recover damage. Other circumstances: Defendant A’s age, sex, living environment, and circumstances after the crime are committed;

2. The portion not guilty

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is that the victim F (the age of 45) who was walking along the roadside at the time and place specified in the facts charged in the judgment, expressed his desire to do so, and the victim F (the age of 45) expressed his desire to do so, and thus, the Defendant A was able to see the victim’s breath with her hand, as stated in the facts charged in the judgment, and Defendant B went beyond the floor of the victim’s breath and her head.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence prior to the judgment on the part concerning Defendant B, the evidence submitted in the instant case alone is sufficient to support the victim jointly with the Defendant A.