logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.11.29 2018고정992
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 1, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for one year for embezzlement at the Goyang Branch of the District Court for the Defendant’s High Court for the first time on June 9, 2018 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 9, 2018.

The defendant and victims have become aware of the communication related to stock investment in the Internet Kctop site "B".

The defendant was willing to acquire money from the victims under the stock investment name by using the trust relationship, such as leading them to a stock expert.

1. The criminal defendant against the victim C (51 tax, female) calls to the victim C at a place where it is not known to the first police officer on March 2017, 2017 to give him/her the principal and interest by making a share investment if he/she receives money.

A false statement was made to the effect that interest will be paid as principal.

However, in fact, the Defendant was a bad credit holder at the time, and the amount received from the injured was planned to be used for personal purposes, such as repayment of debts, living expenses, etc. of the cosmetics company operated by the father of the Defendant, and there was no intention or ability to pay interest to the victim as principal through stock investment.

Ultimately, on March 31, 2017, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 20 million from the Defendant’s corporate bank account (E) in each of the Defendant’s name D around March 31, 2017 from the victim.

2. On March 31, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the Victim F (hereinafter “victim F”) that “I would create two times after one month from the loan of KRW 30 million to the Victim F at a place where it is not known about March 31, 2017.”

However, in fact, the defendant was a bad credit holder at the time, and the money received from the injured person was planned to use the cosmetics company's debt repayment and living expenses operated by his father for personal purposes, and there was no intention or ability to return the money received from the injured person twice after the month through stock investment.

Ultimately, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.

arrow