All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the Defendant (i.e., imprisonment for nine months, forfeiture (No. 1, 2) is too unreasonable.

B. The prosecutor (unfair sentencing)’s sentence is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the circumstances revealed by the lower court in the grounds for sentencing and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s sentencing is determined to be proper by fully considering the various sentencing grounds asserted by the Defendant and the Prosecutor, and it does not seem to be too heavy or too low, and there are no other special circumstances to the extent that the above punishment would be changed. Therefore, each of the above unfair sentencing arguments by the Defendant and the Prosecutor are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since all appeals filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit, they are all dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, since it is obvious that the "150,000 won" of 21 criminal facts stated in paragraph (2) of the judgment below is a clerical error of "150,000 won", it is obvious that it is a clerical error of "150,000 won," and thus,