The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On May 1, 2012, at around 19:00, the Defendant reported the warehouse newly built in the Defendant’s house at Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, to Kimcheon-si, and publicly insulting the victim by publicly insulting the victim on the ground that there is no adequate appraisal about the complaint previously filed by the victim D in the case of injury.

B. At around 11:40 on May 8, 2012, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim at the place where the villagers, such as the above E, are located, for the foregoing reasons as seen earlier, in the instant case, in a large amount of the following grounds: (a) the Defendant used to read “years to report, singing years, years outside the law, years outside the law, and years where hackers are covered.”

2. The “public performance” in the crime of insult refers to the state in which many, unspecified or unspecified persons can be recognized. Thus, if there is a possibility that a certain fact about a specific person might be disseminated to an unspecified or unspecified person, it shall be deemed that the requirements of public performance are satisfied, or if there is no possibility of spreading any other fact, it shall be deemed that the public performance is lacking.

(See Supreme Court Decision 83Do49 delivered on April 10, 1984, etc.). A witness D, the complainant, made a statement to the effect that “D’s son F and two police officers were present at each site in the facts charged, and there was no other person.” The witness E made a statement to the effect that “I could not hear the Defendant’s desire at each site in the facts charged,” and the witness E appears to have no other person than the Defendant D, F, and police officers at each site indicated in the facts charged (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 83Do49 delivered on April 10, 1984). Accordingly, it is difficult to believe that there was no other person in each site indicated in the facts charged, such as D, F, and police officers, in light of the contents of each written statement in D, E, and E’s respective legal statements).