logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.11.30 2015고단3122
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:40 on October 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in front of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu Park Park for Children, the police officers, etc. belonging to the Seoul Mine Police Station B district called the Defendant, who called the Defendant after having received 112 report that the Defendant would assault the taxi articles, and interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officers on the prevention, investigation and investigation of the police officers, public safety and maintenance of order by assaulting the b district of the Seoul Mine Police Station B district, which called “I am the same as that of drinking water; and (b) I am you am back to the police station at his house. I am you am am off to the police station. I am am off. I am am off. I am am. I am. I am am. I am am off. I am am.) with the floor of the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order: The crimes of this case are less severe than the nature of the crime, the damage recovery therefrom, and other favorable circumstances: the initial crime, the degree of violence and the result of damage are not relatively heavy, the confession of and reflect against the crime, and other factors of sentencing indicated in the arguments and records of this case shall be determined as per the disposition, comprehensively taking into account various factors of sentencing indicated in the arguments and records of this case.

arrow