A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On August 16, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year for a violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act in the Sungwon District Court's Sungnam branch, and the Defendant completed the execution of the said sentence in the original prison on July 1, 2013.

1. On April 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around the new wall on April 1, 2015, thiefeded the victim’s eart route operated by Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “C”); (b) the sum totaling KRW 50,000 of the market value of butane gas owned by the victim who was kept in a tent for the storage of the said marina goods.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim.

2. No person shall take in or inhale hallucinogenic gases which are hallucinogenic substances, shall cause smoking, hallucination, or anesthesia;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as of April 1, 2015 from around the same month to February 2, 2015, opened a 16 lid of carbon emissions from among the stolen butane gases, such as the Seoul Gangdong-gu F apartment 2, 234 Dong 103, and paragraph (1), and inhaled by taking gas emissions into the mouth and co-ins.

Accordingly, the defendant inhaled carbon gases, which are hallucinogenic substances.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Seizure records and voluntary submission;

1. A written appraisal;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of a photograph of the arrest site);

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on criminal records, etc., personal identification and confinement status;

1. Relevant Articles 329 of the Criminal Act, subparagraph 6 of Article 59 of the Chemicals Control Act, Article 22 (1) of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of imprisonment, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the fact that the victim sought the Defendant’s wife by compensating the thief victim for damages due to the reason of sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes, and that the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s mistake, and that the Defendant has already repented in depth is favorable to the Defendant.

However, the Defendant had already committed the instant crime.