logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2021.03.25 2020고단4498
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On December 23, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and a fine of 600,000 won for one year by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Seoul Southern District Court on December 23, 202, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on December 31, 202 [criminal Records]

1. The Defendant, on November 8, 2020, voluntarily retired from the train that passed the Mapo Station of 33 EMapo as of Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul on November 18, 2020, without any justifiable reason, against the victim B ( South, 16 years old), the victim C ( South, 16 years old), the victim D ( South, 16 years old), and the victim D ( South, 16 years old);

Does there be tobacco

” 등을 물어보며 시비를 걸었고, 피해자들에게 가라는 손짓을 하여 피해자들이 열차의 옆 객실로 이동하자 피해자들을 따라가 “ 야 이 새끼야, 가!”, “ 야, 이 씨 발” 이라고 수차례 소리를 지르고 피해자들을 향해 수차례 손과 무릎을 들어 올려 때리려는 시늉을 하고 자신의 팔뚝으로 피해자 B의 가슴 부위를 밀치는 등 피해자들을 각각 폭행하였다.

2. No person who violates railroad safety Acts shall interfere with the performance of duties of railroad workers due to violence or intimidation;

Around November 18, 2020, the Defendant: (a) expressed a bath to “Chewing” on the ground that he/she was asked about the content of the instant case to himself/herself, who is a railroad worker that arrived at upon receiving a report that there was a disturbance in the luminous basin located in 172, as the Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, by asking him/her of the content of the instant case. (b) around November 18, 2020, the Defendant was pushed the victim’s chest by hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of railroad workers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to C by the police in the protocol; and

1. Each statement prepared by B, D, and E;

1. Each description of a report on internal investigation (FF currency for a witness), a report on internal investigation (report on the victims' telephone hearing), an investigation report (report on the on-site video review of the case), an investigation report (report on the on-site video review of the victims), and an investigation report (report on the accompanying identification card of the victim service personnel);

1. Previouss before the judgment: the text of the judgment;

arrow