A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 18, 2013, Defendant 2015 Ma 3098, Defendant 3098 walked a telephone to D who operates the Victim C Co., Ltd. at a place where it is impossible to know the place around October 18, 2013, and “E is the president of B, and E supplies school meals.

When the meal service is supplied, the price for the supply is paid after 15 days.

As a result, it was false to read “the supply of swinf and swinf in the school meal service”.

However, around October 2013, the Defendant was unable to receive livestock products from the existing suppliers unless the price was paid in advance for about KRW 500-60 million to other livestock products suppliers. The deficit accumulated and was difficult to pay the employee's wages. Since the Defendant supplied the scrap, etc. supplied by the damaged person to various schools, it was thought that the Defendant would have used the scrap, etc. to receive the payment from the injured person, and thus, there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if having received the scrap from the injured person.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around October 18, 2013, supplied livestock products in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, such as Korea-style milk equivalent to KRW 1,141,250, which had been supplied by the employees of the victim company. From that time, until December 20, 2013, the Defendant obtained the supply of livestock products, including Korea-style milk equivalent to KRW 13,585,030, total sum of KRW 55,030, including Korea-style milk, from December 20, 2013.

Defendant 3287, on June 2014, Defendant 1: (a) entered into a meal contract with 12 schools other than friendly high schools; and (b) on June 16, 2014, with the Defendant located in Songpa-gu Seoul Singman Co., Ltd. in the office in which the Defendant actually operated, and with the victim H (50).

6. To collect meal expenses from schools where raw materials of livestock products are supplied up to 30.

7. Until 15, a false statement was made that the price would be paid without mold.

However, in fact, the defendant is worth approximately KRW 230 million without any property as a bad credit holder at the time.