1. On December 23, 2013, Busan Dong-gu Do-gu 201, drafted between the Plaintiff and the Defendant B.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a friendship with E, and Defendant C is the husband of Defendant C, and Defendant C and E.

B. The Plaintiff is not clear whether the Plaintiff stored or borrowed in custody with E.

On December 23, 2013, the dispute over E’s KRW 50 million had occurred, and on December 23, 2013, Defendant C borrowed KRW 25 million from the said money to Defendant C by means of a notary public F’s notarial deed No. 1070, Dec. 23, 2013, stating that “the said Defendant borrowed KRW 25 million from the said Defendant to the end of December 23, 2014,” and that “the repayment shall be made by December 23, 2014.” Of the said money, the Plaintiff issued a notarial deed No. 1070,000,000 to the Defendants as to KRW 25 million from the said money, which was owned by the Plaintiff, signed a lease agreement with the period from December 23, 2013 to December 22, 2015.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant lease agreement”). [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, entry in the evidence Nos. 1 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Assertion and determination

A. The plaintiff asserted 1,00,000 won, while keeping E's money of KRW 50,000,000, 10,000,000,000 won was paid to E from time to time to time by bank remittance or cash payment of KRW 22,825,00,00,000 to E. However, the defendant C demanded to prepare a notarial deed with respect to KRW 25,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won was paid to E. However, although the plaintiff was able to prepare a notarial deed, the plaintiff could not prepare a notarial deed in violation of the facts, the defendant C was forced to enter the notarial deed with his own money and KRW 25,000,000,00,000,000,000.