logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2011. 06. 10. 선고 2011두4275 판결
(심리불속행) 공동사업자로부터 자신의 지분비율 양도소득금액을 지급받지 못한 경우 양도소득의 귀속[일부패소]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2009Nu27710 ( October 15, 2011)

Case Number of the previous trial

National High Court Decision 2007west1455 (Law No. 21, 2007.09)

Title

(ps) Where a joint businessman has not received any capital gains from his/her share ratio, the ownership of the capital gains;

Summary

(b) Even if a joint business operator fails to receive his/her share of capital gains from the joint business operator, only the other joint business operator has a right to claim a profit distribution under the agreement, and the amount of capital gains shall be attributed to himself/herself

Cases

2011Du4275 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellee

-Appellant

HongA

Defendant-Appellant

-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2009Nu27710 Decided February 15, 201

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against each appellant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

Reference materials.

If the grounds of final appeal are not included in the grounds of final appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of trial without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal, and refers to the system of dismissal of final appeal by judgment without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal (see this case, e.g.,

arrow