The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, who spits or spits facts with police officers, was immediately spited by the suppression, and there is no spits or spits against police officers.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (two years of suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment, community service) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined and adopted in the lower court’s judgment, namely, ① Police Officers F and G, who were dispatched to the site on the day of the instant case, have consistently been bread from the investigative agency to the investigation agency to the present court, so as to have the Defendant take measures for returning home on the road. However, the Defendant spiting F’s face while taking a bath, and plucked and plucked F’s hand.

진술하고 있고, 위 경찰관들이 피고인을 허위로 무고할 별다른 이유가 없는 등 진술의 신빙성을 의심할 특별한 사정이 보이지 않는 점, ② 사건 당일 F의 손목을 찍은 사진에 피고인의 손톱으로 긁혀 생긴 상처가 나타나는 점, ③ 피고인은 술은 마셨으나 정신이 멀쩡한 상태로 서 있던 중에 경찰관들이 말을 걸었다고

However, police officers at the time are asserting that "Awhished Awhish is running on the road."

In full view of the fact that the Defendant was dispatched upon the receipt of a report, and the Defendant appears to have been under the influence of alcohol, such as verbal abuse and gathering letters by police officers even after he was arrested in the police box, the Defendant may sufficiently recognize the fact that spits or plucks the Defendant F and pls the arms to the police officers, as indicated in the facts of the crime.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

B. It is recognized that there is no record of punishment for a crime other than punishment imposed by a fine in 1995.

However, it is intended for the defendant to assist him in being drunk.