logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
대전지방법원 2013.10.16 2013고정932
소방시설설치ㆍ유지및안전관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A, B, C, D, and E shall be punished by each fine of KRW 700,00,00, Defendant F, and G shall be punished by each fine of KRW 300,00.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are divided owners of J upper family (total floor area of 5,817.24 square meters) which are collective buildings located in Daejeon-gu I.

An interested person of a specific fire-fighting object with a total floor area of not less than 5,00§³ equipped with fire-fighting equipment, such as a sprinkler system, under the Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems Act, shall conduct regular self-inspection of the fire-fighting system installed in the object or have the management business entity or the technical qualification prescribed by Ordinance

Nevertheless, until December 31, 2010, Defendants violated the above Act by failing to conduct a self-inspection of the building in 2010.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant E’s legal statement;

1. Each statement made by the defendant B, D, F, and G in the first trial record;

1. Statement of Defendant C in the second protocol of trial;

1. Defendant A's statement in the third protocol of trial;

1. Statement of the prosecution concerning K;

1. Reporting the progress of investigation by the JJ on the current status of investigation, guidance and guidance on conducting comprehensive precise inspections of fire-fighting systems in December 2010, submission of reports on the results of comprehensive precise inspections of fire-fighting systems, submission of reports on the results of comprehensive precise inspections of fire-fighting systems, plans for special fire safety inspection (J standings) subject to violation of the fire-

1. The Defendants: Article 49 Subparag. 2 and Article 25(1) of the Installation, Maintenance, and Safety Control of Fire-Fighting Systems Act (amended by Act No. 11037, Aug. 4, 201); and Article 49 Subparag. 2 of the same Act (amended by Act No. 11037, Feb. 5, 201);

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.

arrow