logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.01.08 2013고단3728
모해위증등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for four months, respectively.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on May 10, 2013, the Suwon District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to six months of imprisonment for the crime of taking property in breach of trust and became final and conclusive on July 23, 2013.

1. Defendant A

A. On June 2009, the Defendant received from G to December 22, 2010, a total sum of KRW 5.9 million from G, under the pretext that he received the introduction of the representative G of the construction execution company F company in relation to the installation of an apartment parking lot monitoring camera in relation to the installation of an apartment from the head of the management office of Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, which was the head of the apartment field leader, and considered convenience in the selection of the construction company.

On May 11, 2011, in the process of the Defendant’s selection of the construction company of the above apartment playground installation project as the (ju)H through a bid, the Defendant contacted with the (ju) H in advance, made the (ju) H to be designated as the construction company on February 23, 201, and received the public notice form from the (ju) H to participate in the bidding at the same time, and then made the (ju) H to be the most competitive bidder, and made the (ju) H to be selected as the construction company of the sports playground installation project, thereby conducting an unfair bid.

Nevertheless, around August 2, 2011, the Defendant sent an organization text message to the apartment residents to the effect that “A, a manager of the apartment field, has caused enormous damage to the residents by combining with the construction companies of the parking lot monitoring camera and the play place installation business,” which was the director of the management office, the Defendant, who was the director of the apartment field, sent to the apartment residents, and had the intent to raise I with the intent to escape this.

On August 23, 2011, the Defendant is unable to engage in any collusion or conspiracy, as it is strictly managed and confirmed by the council of occupants' representatives in accordance with all procedures, such as decision on construction and bid, in addition to the complainants, at the Suwon-nam Police Station, which is located in 52, Young-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do.

arrow