본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.11 2017고단795

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.


Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who engages in sexual traffic business, with the trade name called "E" in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dtel 503, with the suspension of the execution of two years in August 4, 2014 (the suspension of the execution of two years in imprisonment, July 12, 2014, and July 12, 2014).

From November 26, 2013 to October 02:30 of the same month, the Defendant advertised the above establishment with C, “F,” etc. on the Internet site, and offered reservations, guidance, etc., and the Defendant conducted an interview with H, who is an employee of G (as of July 4, 2014, a fine of KRW 3 million, the final decision of July 12, 2014, and the final decision of July 12, 2014), and moved H into the above establishment, took 1.30,00 won for each sex purchase, and caused H to do sexual intercourse with South and North Korea, thereby engaging in an act in collusion with C, such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against C and H;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of each police in relation to C or G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer concerning I, J, K, and L;

1. Publicity output, etc.;

1. Application of the case search results and the text of the judgment

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution include: (a) the Defendant’s mistake and reflects on the grounds of sentencing; (b) the Defendant has been punished for a similar crime in the past; (c) the Defendant’s escape after the instant case; and (d) the circumstances after the instant crime are not good; and (c) the period of participation in business is short; and (d) the Defendant’s various conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant pleadings, such as the overall circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant; and (d)