logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.02.16 2016고단2504
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-A-hurd motor vehicle.

On September 10, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.088% at around 00:30 on September 10, 2016, and driven the said car at a speed that would not be known by two lanes in front of the E-ju point in D at the south of the luminous Ocean.

At night, at the time, there was a victim H rocketing taxi owned by the victim G who stops on the front side of the road, which is a passenger of the victim F, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and accurately operate the steering gear while driving on the front side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to proceed with it as it is, while taking the part behind the said taxi into account the upper part of the front part of the said taxi, and due to its shock, the part behind the left part of the said vehicle parked by the victim J on the three-lane of the said road was taken into account as the front part of the said AEK car in front of the right part of the said AEK car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim G and F with the above occupational negligence on the part of the victim G and F for about two weeks of light salt, and at the same time, the repair cost of KRW 4,114,928, such as the exchange of panions, destroyed the above taxi to the extent that the repair cost of KRW 1,409,908, such as the exchange of front left door, and escaped without taking necessary measures such as aiding victims, even if the above X-ray car was damaged to the extent that the repair cost, such as the exchange of front door on the left side, was damaged, and the victim was relieved.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against J and F;

1. Report on internal investigation (the identity of the suspected person A) and report on internal investigation (the accompanying at will of the suspected person A);

1. Report on internal investigation (the calculation of the dmark formula above alcohol concentration in blood as at the time the person under suspicion A was involved);

1. A copy of the ledger using drinks for drinking;

1. Evidence and photographs of the traffic accident scene;

1. Each letter of diagnosis;

arrow