A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 29, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act at the Daegu District Court on June, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 6, 2013.

1. The defendant, on July 11, 2005, posted a telephone to the victim B, lent an agency operation fund to the victim B from the French land, and used the same year after temporarily.

8. The first police officer said that the payment will be made with the settlement of the amount of oil products that were not paid to the first police officer.

However, in fact, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay money to the victim because the transaction amount of milk products that was not paid to the victim at the time was equivalent to KRW 72 million, and there was no financial standing.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 5,820,000 from the victim’s bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

2. On July 18, 2005, the Defendant presented four copies of the household check, which was issued D’s three million won as the price for the goods, to the above victim in the vicinity of the Yang Ma-gun, Ma-gun, Ma-gun, Ma-gun, Ma-gun, and received the above check. Since cash needs to be paid, the Defendant took an attitude that the above check would be paid normally on the date of presentation.

However, in fact, the defendant merely borrowed four copies of the above household check from D, and it is unclear whether D would pay the above household check normally, and the defendant from June of the same year to the same year.

7. Until the first police officer, the number of face value 60 million won was issued, but there was no intention or ability to pay the check money properly because of economic difficulties, such as it is impossible to do so.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 11,460,000 won from the non-bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day as the discount money of the above household check from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The part concerning the statement in B in the police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. B.