Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above judgment against the Defendants for two years from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Public invitation relationship] H produced and operated the Internet sports gambling site under the name of “I”, “J”, “K, “L”, “M”, “N”, and “O.” Defendant A, B, and P decided to take charge of gambling site management, membership management, and exchange affairs, and member consultation at the solar office operated by the above H.

[2] A person who is not an entrusted business entity or a national sports promotion corporation of the Seoul Olympic Games and a person who is not an entrusted business entity shall not engage in an act of offering property or property benefits to those who win the result by issuing sports promotion voting rights or things similar thereto (including issuing through an information and communications network), and no person shall establish a place or space for gambling for profit.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired with the above H and P to January 2016, and from February 2016 to August 2016, Defendant A operated the Internet sports gambling site, such as “I”, “J”, and “K, at the 2nd floor A, from the beginning of February 2016 to August 2016, and the users visiting the above site enter the above sports sports gambling site, such as “I”, “J”, and “K, etc., in collusion with the above H, P, etc., or carried out shooting on board the sports games, such as sports clubs, such as cattle, spath, spath, and spath, at home and abroad, the Defendants did not participate in the above sports, and the Defendants did not participate in the exchange of money for a total period from around 15,572,408,208, and from around 29, the Defendants did not participate in the commission of money distribution to the total amount of money deposited from around 2015.

The act of providing property or property benefits to the enemy after receiving the deposit, and at the same time opening a space for gambling for profit-making purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each of the Defendants’ respective legal statements.