logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2015.06.16 2014가단202178
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 3,00,000, and 5% per annum from July 25, 2014 to June 16, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 14, 2012, Plaintiff A entered into D and worked as the crew of G passenger ship operating between E-F from the above date to April 30, 2014. Plaintiff B entered D on May 1, 2009 and worked as the crew of the said passenger ship from May 31, 2012 to May 31, 2014.

The defendant worked as the captain of the above passenger ship that the plaintiffs worked as the crew.

B. Defendant’s act 1) On October 2012, 2012, the Defendant talked that Plaintiff A’s losses and that it would be bad to Plaintiff A’s losses inside the said passenger ship. 2) On April 2013, the Defendant took up Plaintiff A’s shoulder in the office located in the E-port passenger terminal around the end of April 2013.

3) 피고는 2013. 5. 초경 위 여객선에 있는 사무실에서 원고 A의 손목을 잡았다. 4) 피고는 2013. 6. 초경 위 여객선 내에서 원고 A의 양손을 잡았고, 그 후 양손으로 원고 A의 이마에 자신의 이마를 맞대고 비볐다.

5) While Plaintiff A suffered considerable displeasure due to the Defendant’s above acts, the Defendant did not resist against the Defendant, a superior. C. Defendant’s act against Plaintiff B 1) sent the Kakakao Stockholm text message to the effect that the Defendant love Plaintiff B around the end of November 2012.

2) On December 2012, the Defendant got off Plaintiff B’s right hand and right buckbucks within the office located in Eth passenger terminal. 3) On July 2013, 2013, the Defendant got out of the Plaintiff’s frame.

4) On July 2013, the Defendant: (a) around the above passenger ship, at the time Plaintiff B’s replacement of the garbage boom; (b) Plaintiff B’s bridge was extremely fluent; (c) Plaintiff B 5) did not make an objection against the Defendant, who was a superior, despite having fluence by the Defendant’s aforementioned act.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the result of the plaintiff B's personal examination, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination.

arrow