beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, each of the above defendants is against the defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants decided to take part in the crime of telephone fraud (sophishing), together with the one-time “E”, “F chief”, “G chief”, etc., and agreed to take part in the crime of telephone fraud (sophishing). The nameless person in charge of the role of telephone fraud receives a loan from the victims who want to obtain the loan by posting a telephone, and received money as the so-called “mull account” because it is necessary to pay guarantee premiums, stamp fees, etc., and received money, “E”, “F chief”, and “G chief”, etc. to withdraw the money obtained by deception to the Defendants. The Defendants conspired to take part in the crime of deception by withdrawing the money obtained by deception deposited in the head of the Tong which was transferred from the nameless person and deposit it into the account in the name of the Defendants which was created in advance, and receive 2
1. On February 22, 2013, the Defendants and the false statement that, in collusion with the aforementioned Defendants, the Defendants made a false statement to the victim H that “the victim would need to pay interest rates in advance to the loan,” and that, the Defendants received 1030,000 won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (J) account in the I’s name, and then deliver the passbook and cash card to the Defendant. Defendant A withdrawn the money obtained through the received cash card, and then deposited the money into the Korean currency securities account in the name of Defendant A from December 28, 2012 to February 25, 2013, and received a remittance of KRW 1158,659,000 from 1113 persons, such as the victim H, etc., as indicated in the attached crime sight (1).
As a result, the Defendants conspired with one another, "E", "F chief", "G chief", and "nameless persons", and acquired the property from the victims.
2. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall transfer or acquire any electronic card, similar electronic information and password, etc. of the electronic financial transaction or establish a pledge right thereon;
Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired as above and Defendant A on February 26, 2013.