A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

All of the applicants' applications for compensation are dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On December 27, 2007, the Defendant purchased the above site and made it possible for the Defendant to conduct the apartment development project. The Defendant purchased the above site and made it possible to purchase the apartment development project. The Defendant held that “I Company” office located in Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu, Incheon, the General Management Officer of C Co., Ltd., “Yeong-gu, Incheon, K Daywon 94,000 square meters.” The Defendant owned 80 percent of the above site to L Co., Ltd. which is an incorporated association managing the patient village.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, the fact was that only 48 percent of the above site was owned by L related parties, and because the above site was an industrial site and it was impossible to develop apartment, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to allow the victim company to purchase the above site with the consent of 2/3 or more of the owners of the site necessary for the apartment development project.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the above J and under its jurisdiction, was transferred KRW 100 million from the victim company to the corporate bank account in the name of the Defendant on February 21, 2008.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness J and D;

1. Partial statement of the witness M;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Two-time suspect examination protocol against the accused (including the J part);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of M;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. A letter of agreement, receipt, reply to civil petition, and proof of details;

1. A criminal investigation report (report on the submission of a passbook to the suspect) / [The J as the witness of the senior executive director of the victim company made a statement consistent with the accused's deception in this court and consistent with the facts charged.

The above statement is specifically and clearly supported by the relevant agreement prepared between the defendant and the victim company [the contents of Article 2 (1) of the Agreement, and the basic outline" column of "the area, quasi-industrial area, nature green area, preservation green area, park, road (as Class 3 by the formulation of Class 1 district unit planning)."