Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of Goyang-gu C building D, E, and F of Goyang-gu.

Where a person who intends to extend a building intends to extend a building with a total floor area of 85 square meters or less in an existing building, he/she shall file a report thereon with a high-sea market, and where he/she intends to extend a building with a total floor area of 85 square meters or more, he

Nevertheless, Defendant B did not report to, or obtain permission from, Yangyang-si Seoul Metropolitan City, and written the written indictment in accordance with G around February 5, 2015, but it is apparent that it is a clerical error in light of relevant evidence. As such, Defendant B ex officio stated in the written indictment of 89.71 square meters of a 89.71 square meter of a steel snick beam with the steel snick beam material at the correction box as above, but it is apparent that it is a clerical error in light of the description in the written accusation, Defendant B made it clear that it is a clerical error. As such, Defendant B without permission extended the amount equivalent to 84.24 square meters in subparagraph E by the same method, and extended the amount equivalent to 95.68 square meters in subparagraph F without permission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written accusation (including attached documents);

1. Article 108(1) and Article 11(1) of the former Building Act (Amended by Act No. 13785, Jan. 19, 2016); Article 111 Subparag. 1 and Article 14(1)1 of the former Building Act (Amended by Act No. 14016, Feb. 3, 2016);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do1448, Apr. 1, 2011>