The appeal is dismissed.
The defendant and public defender's grounds of appeal are also examined.
According to the records, since it is apparent that the defendant appealed the judgment of the first instance on the ground of unfair sentencing only as the grounds for appeal, the defendant cannot be deemed as the grounds for appeal against the judgment of the court of first instance which has reversed the judgment of the first instance and rendered a minor punishment.
(2) In light of the records, the court below’s determination of guilty of the alteration of official document among the facts charged in this case is just, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the co-principal in the crime of alteration of official document.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.