본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
울산지방법원 2014.02.19 2013노1015

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.


1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The facts that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects the defendant's depth of the mistake are favorable to the defendant. However, in light of the circumstance of the case where the defendant was unable to properly inform the victim of the way while the defendant was on board the taxi driving by the victim during the new wall time zone, the crime was very poor in light of the circumstance of the case, the method of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the fact that the crime was committed, the injury suffered is very serious, and the damage was not recovered even though the victim suffered is very serious, the victim has the history of the crime several times, and other criminal records of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too inappropriate.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.