The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for four months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant is against the judgment, and the fact that the instant bus was disposed of in the first instance.

However, considering the fact that the defendant was sentenced to a punishment several times including traffic crimes, in particular, since it has not been long since he was sentenced to a fine for the violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2015, he did not know about the fact that he committed the crime of this case while he was sentenced to a suspended sentence, and other various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., which are conditions for the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it cannot be said that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.